Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 14:01
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
2025 NHL Draft Combine Notebook: What we learned - Daily Faceoff
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The Best ‘Final Fantasy’ References in Its Huge ‘Magic: The Gathering’ Crossover - Gizmodo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Atque nihil laudantium distinctio sapiente similique molestiae.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do unattractive men assume that a pretty woman like me want them?
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Citi Calls Time on Gold’s Rally Due to Slumping Demand, Fed Cuts - Bloomberg.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.